Comments on: Tibhar Hybrid MK

By: Jean-François THÉBAULT

Jean-François THÉBAULT — Sat, 10 May 2025 15:07:53 +0000

Que penser du MK vs K3 fx …

By: HAR

HAR — Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:27:15 +0000

i HVA THE hYBRID mK ON bH IN mAX AND THE bLUESTAR a! ON fh IN maX
aLL ON A bgy jISO hINOKI%:tHAT COMBO SUITS ME GREAT;I FIN THE a! A TAB MORE SPINNER IMD FASTER:

By: Thyago Rodrigo Pelanda

Thyago Rodrigo Pelanda — Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:52:25 +0000

Hello everything is fine? I really like your reviews. I’d like to hear your opinion on a combination I’m wanting to put together. It is important for you to know that I am an athlete who is at a level between intermediate and advanced. My difficulty is in relation to blockages, and materials with high catapult hinder me a lot. I really like putting spin on the ball but without performing the full movements for the sake of agility in the game. I’ve been regressing the speeds of the materials in order to improve my blocking difficulty without affecting my attack power too much. I’m currently using a Fan Zendong ALC with a Nittaku G1 Max, but I’m switching to a Harimoto Innerforce ALC with the intention of improving my blocking. My question now is about the rubber, I’m very undecided about whether to use the Glayzer 09C or the Tibhar MK Hybrid. Reading your reviews I believe that the G09C will be better for blocking, but my concern is about it affecting my attack power too much or being more difficult to play due to it not being very forgiving about angle and movement errors. I understood that the MK Hybrid would be a little better for attacks, easier to play, but worse for blocks. So I would really like you to give me your opinion so that I can make the best decision about which rubber to use on the Harimoto. Thank you in advance for your help.

By: Marcello Serra

Marcello Serra — Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:59:30 +0000

Good morning Mr. Abel. Premise that you are not required to answer me for commercial reasons, I would just like to know what difference there is between a thin topsheet and a thicker one. A few days ago, I purchased a Tibhar MXD. This rubber is very powerful, straight trajectory, very grippy but obviously suffers from the opponent's effects; in short, it is a "nervous" rubber. So I went back to Fastarc G1, a rubber that is also powerful but more balanced. Although she also has an excellent grip, she is not affected by the effects of her opponent.
 
The G1 topsheet seems stiffer to me. Does it depend on the thickness or on the pimpls? I have tried various rubbers and for now I have understood that some aspects are fundamental: the hardness of the sponge (personally I prefer 47/48 degrees) then, the porosity of the sponge (I prefer the small or fine pored) the sponge with large pores, produces a lot of catapult.
 
You, who certainly have more experience than me, could you be more precise about the pimples and the thickness of the topsheet? how many variables are there? companies should write this data
Currently, for my backhand I'm very happy with the Xiom Vega X. I'd say it works well. On the forehand a little more power would be needed and I was thinking of the Tibhar MK. I tried the Xiom V Asia hardness 50, it's a good rubber but I discovered that it has large pores...

By: taz07

taz07 — Sun, 17 Dec 2023 11:43:06 +0000

great review, do you think it could be alternative to fastarc c-1 on an off blade like andro novacell off/s ?

Does this rubber can be used for a long time or lost quicly his capacity ?

thanks

By: tt89player

tt89player — Wed, 11 Oct 2023 07:30:08 +0000

In reply to Ian.

Hi Ian,

it is for sure. But still I would give the T05 an edge over the MK in terms of spin while looping. On the other hand, the Mk is easier to play.

Best regards,
Marcel

By: Ian

Ian — Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:05:34 +0000

Great review, thanks. I have been looking for a rubber with similar spin capabilities to tenergy 05 but with more control as it will be sat on my viscaria. Thinking this is worth a try.