<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Nittaku Factive	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tt-spin.com/nittaku-factive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.tt-spin.com/nittaku-factive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 22:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Abdullah		</title>
		<link>https://www.tt-spin.com/nittaku-factive/#comment-363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdullah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 22:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tt-spin.com/?p=3801#comment-363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How does this compare with Vega Europe? And what do you mean by 

&quot;Dangerousness with faster strokes&quot; in the cons section, does it mean it is unforgiving when you play faster strokes?


I can also sense something similar here when you wrote:

&quot;So if you’re an advanced beginner who hits the balls a bit harder, be it on topspins or backspins, you’ll do better with the Vega Intro, while the Factive is perhaps even easier to play with and simply works on a very low impact hardness.&quot;

This paragraph seems confusing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this compare with Vega Europe? And what do you mean by </p>
<p>&#8220;Dangerousness with faster strokes&#8221; in the cons section, does it mean it is unforgiving when you play faster strokes?</p>
<p>I can also sense something similar here when you wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;So if you’re an advanced beginner who hits the balls a bit harder, be it on topspins or backspins, you’ll do better with the Vega Intro, while the Factive is perhaps even easier to play with and simply works on a very low impact hardness.&#8221;</p>
<p>This paragraph seems confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
